more at http://news.quickfound.net/intl/saudi_arabia_news.html
“‘This is a story of a venture by American capital in a strange and ancient land,’ says the narrator. Shows the search and extraction of oil in Saudi Arabia, necessary to power the American ‘nation on wheels.'”
NEW VERSION with improved video & sound: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YEtOUWfIuc
Public domain film from the Library of Congress Prelinger Archive, slightly cropped to remove uneven edges, with the aspect ratio corrected, and mild video noise reduction applied.
The soundtrack was also processed with volume normalization, noise reduction, clipping reduction, and equalization.
Split with MKVmerge GUI (part of MKVToolNix), the same software can recombine the downloaded parts (in mp4 format): http://www.bunkus.org/videotools/mkvtoolnix/doc/mkvmerge-gui.html
part 1: had to be removed due to copyright CLAIM against it.
http://news.quickfound.net/intl/saudi_arabia_news.html
TIME Magazine, January 15, 1951, p. 69:
-BUSINESS & FINANCE: FOREIGN TRADE:
-Half & Half
– In the garden of his modern home two miles outside Jedda, Saudi Arabia’a shrewd old (60) Finance Minister Abdullah El Suleiman sat down to wait for a visitor. For greater comfort in the muggy 80° heat, he slipped off his sandals. When a U.S. car rolled up, barefooted Abdullah arose, greeted Arabian American Oil Co.’s Executive Vice President Fred A. Davies and ushered him inside.
– There, over small earthenware cups of tea and thick coffee, they scratched their signatures to a historic document. When the news of its contents came out last week, it delighted other oil-rich Middle Eastern nations, but it dismayed Great Britain. Davies, in revising Aramco’s 17-year-old agreement with Saudi Arabia’s King Ibn Saud, had given him the most generous deal ever made in all the turbulent history of Middle Eastern oil.
– In effect, Aramco made old Ibn Saud an equal partner, who would share & share alike in all of Aramco’s profits, including 1950’s whopping net (before royalties) of $180 million. For Ibn Saud and Saudi Arabia, it meant a kingly take of $90 million, 50% more than the $60 million that would have been paid under the old royalty payments of 34¢ a barrel. If, as expected, Aramco rings up an operating profit of $200 million in 1951, Ibn Saud will get half of that.
– What dismayed the British was that they had been closely bargaining for months with the Iranian government to accept much lower royalties from the Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. (TIME, Jan. 8). The British government, which controls Anglo-Iranian, feared that the Iranians, who now get considerably less than half of Anglo-Iranian’s profits, would never settle for less than a 50-50 split. In addition, Anglo-Iranian and the five other owners of the Iraq Petroleum Co. had just about completed long negotiations with Iraq on a new contract. Now that deal, too, seemed certain to blow sky-high.
– “Take a Law.” Actually, Aramco had had little choice in its deal. Ibn Saud… had been demanding more money for two years…
– For two months Aramco’s Davies and his lawyers argued with Abdullah, protesting that the decree violated their 1933 agreement. Unimpressed, Abdullah said that even rich nations like the U.S. find that they have to boost their taxes now & then. Furthermore, he said, Standard Oil Co. (N.J.), one of Aramco’s owners, had made a 50-50 split five years ago with Venezuela.
– Davies then offered the flat 50-50 in return for two important concessions: Abdullah promised in the written contract that the arrangement would be his top demand; he also agreed that Aramco, instead of paying entirely in U.S. dollars and sterling as before, could pay Saudi Arabia in the currencies it takes in from sales. With this assurance, Davies believed that Aramco could do more business in Italy, France, and other soft-currency markets (95% of Aramco’s market is outside the U.S.).
– Take a Lesson. Aramco was reasonably happy with the deal. After investing $400 million in Saudi Arabia, it had boosted production 46-fold in a decade, to a rate of 650,000 barrels daily (equal to 11% of all U.S. domestic production). With the prospect of an expanding market, and with its development work largely completed, Aramco recognized that Saudi Arabia was entitled to a bigger share than it had gotten during the years of exploration work.
– Moreover, Aramco preferred to make a generous deal now–and win the prospect of a long period of good feeling–rather than to haggle and build up resentment. It had not forgotten that accumulated resentment caused Mexico to expropriate U.S. oil companies in 1938. It also knew that Jersey Standard’s generous 1945 settlement with Venezuela had built immense good will…
www.bitrixme.com
Recent Comments